We can ask ourselves the question, for what reason had the English undertaken such an action in favor of this secret Muslim religious sect?
We can rapidly stipulate that the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood and the activities of their members, a gathering of what was in fact considered to be quite primitive and rudimentary at the beginning of the previous century, was in fact the product of imperialist powers which we have named, “the Round Table.” This gathering of the Muslim Brotherhood was then put under the authority of the Royal Institute Arnauld Thuin Bey, whose first vocation was attending to international questions.
The first stage of their plan consisted of the experimentation of their politico-religious doctrine in Iran as well as in Egypt. Similarly, the Franco-masons played an important role on this path through the great Lodge of Scotland, along with fellow brothers such as Sayed Djamâl Aldin Assad Abadie and his compatriots, as well as Mohamad Abâdé. Following several meetings, they could put into place the argument of the “Islam Change.”
Immediately after, Hassan Al Bâna was assassinated by the secret police of Malik Al Ferough in Egypt (Ferough was the brother of the first wife of Mohamad Reza Chah of Iran,) but their activities did not stop there. In Egypt in 1950, there existed nearly 2 million members and sympathizers. Their vigor therefore took a new turn: at the time of the departure they had emphasized operations of “behavior” of the people in the middle of diverse conferences and declarations. So, they directed themselves towards paramilitary operations. That which we are currently witnessing in the Middle East has as an origin the creation of the State of Israel in 1948.
The flag or the logo of the Muslim Brotherhood is made up of the sign of the Koran at its summit, two bended rapiers which cross in the middle, as well as the first world of the Koran placed at the very top, and on the very bottom their insignia.
In the last century, the English put in place the first Muslim organization and named it the Salafiya (Salafides,) that which signifies in Arab “the return to its origins, to its ancestors.”
For the English, the supported beliefs of the masses with regards to oligarchic organizations in the colonized countries of Asia, and in particular the Middle East, were considered to be one of the best methods of controlling and examining their thought.
The goal was to put the teachings of Mohamad Ghazali Toussi, an obscure Iranian Muslim fundamentalist thinker of the 11th century, in very close correlation with current Islamism.
It is necessary to remind ourselves that this integral thinker was raised in an era against the ideas of the great Iranian philosopher, Ibn Sina, also called ABou Ali Sina, and well known in the west under the name of a great doctor and Muslim philosopher of Avicenne. He would have therefore set fire to the books of Avicenne and would have also combated against the ideas of another Iranian savant, namely Abou Nass Fârâbâi.
It is also necessary to know that in France, at the beginning of the Renaissance, at the Sorbonne, Avicenne’s medical writings are used, translated from Arabic and Persian into Latin, like the famous book called, “Al Châfâ” (The Cure); concerning philosophy, it would influenced much of the world.
Once the renewal of the doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood was well established, they then, in the beginning of the 1920s, began to apply their politico-religious concepts. Thus this community took an enormously important upswing in the Middle East and in other countries, to such a point that they could play an essential role in English politics in the region, notably through the Israeli-Arab conflict, throughout the coming 30 years.
Since then, their politics and other projects are still in progress. The anti-Zionist propaganda is an important method of disrupting the conciliation between the Jews and the Arabs in order to conserve the interests of the English power, which does not which for any agreements between the two peoples.
Elsewhere, that which the westerns were able to retain of the “djihad” (the Holy War of Islam) concept are only the negative and extreme aspects of this term, which sometimes we extrapolate as acts of terrorism. At the time of combat, this “djihad” in Islam is something at the interior of every human being.
The true meaning would be the combat of a man strongly seated upon his religious convictions, which would struggle within him against the evil acts that are committed every day. It does not therefore concern solely the bringing of battle against the non-Muslim infidels or even evil Muslims. This word of engagement, in French, would be used in the most extreme of cases and would not reflect its true meaning in Arab tongue.
In reality, the Muslim Brotherhood is an immense machine at the service of religious integrating.
Their revenues result from certain imperialist powers. Their objective is the putting in place of troubles at the service of the interests of certain tendencies of the Israeli and English governments.
In the heart of the current Islamic regime in Iran, the most part of religious dignitaries in the cities of Ghôme and Nadjaf (in Iraq) are members of this organization named “the triangle of imperialism,” particularly a group of Zionists, Franco-masons, and the Muslim Brotherhood. It was also, at a time, a group that the deceased Khomeiny had belonged to.
In addition to shedding the superstition and religious fundamentalism, one of their essential objectives consists of fomenting the diverse forms of agitations and misdeeds in the region in order to conserve the long-term profit of Israeli extremists and to pursue to the famous objective of the creation of the great State of Israel (the Fertile Crescent.)
At the current hour, the Hodjatya sect, who was profoundly able to penetrate the different official politico-military organizations of the region, continues toward their goal in complete accordance with the famous “triangle of imperialism,” with certain powerful English and Israeli agents.
It is necessary to specify that it is not only the English who search to favor this climate of revolutionary trouble, but once this wind of agitation is well established, they will search to deviate it in their favor.
Each revolutionary group that is created by English agents benefits from different tactics, plans of action, and precise projects on their behalf. For example, in Iran, the different fanatic organizations which are the fedayins of Islam, the Ismaelians, the Hodjatya, the Moudjahiddines of the People, as well as the Hamas outside of Iran, the God Lovers in Libya, the Moudjahiddines of Islam, Al-Queda (the basis of Islam,) and all the other organizations, are in fact the diverse branches of a common trunk which is the Muslim Brotherhood, which evidently pursues with different objectives the same revolutionary goals.
After the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East, their activity took a new flight in occidental Europe.
Moreover, the fundamental ideas of this sect have been in existence without influencing political life in the most part of Middle Eastern countries.
Unfortunately, at the current time, Europe has become like a political sanctuary where the most part of their members and sympathizers have taken refuge.
France and Germany, due to their strategical position, are the two countries which have welcome the highest amount of Muslim immigrants in the last few years, and the Muslim Brotherhood have been able to found in these countries important political bases.
Finally, they are undertaking official activities in Egypt; the man named Muhammad Méhdi Aakéf is their 7th political leader, thus they have held roughly 80 legal representatives in the Egyptian Parliament.